reduce the complaints of most of X’s detractors to mere uninformed rubbish. To any “normal” user the “computer” appears “locked up”.īut for anything local… meaning on the same lan, or otherwise with a latency of a few milliseconds or less, X is great.Īnd when the client and server are running on the local maching, Unix sockets, MITSHM, DRI, etc. To say that X alone is unusably slow at the remote locations does not even begin to cover the issue. About 35 others are in cities in two different states. I need to keep about 60 desktop users happy. Do browsing, email, and office work over it. Please note that this tutorial is tailored to customers of OakHost, but it should work for everyone using macOS. Try running a Gnome, KDE, or whatever desktop over that ssh forwarded connection. Installing and connecting to NoMachine on macOS In this tutorial we will be looking at how to connect to your macOS device using NoMachine. It’s a matter of the extreme number of round trips that most apps require, and the latencies involved. It’s not a matter of the amount of data transfered. Wherever your desktop is, you can access it from any other device. Reach your computer on the other side of the world in just a few clicks. When I try to login via Nomachine, and after I press the sign-in button. Thanks to our NX technology, NoMachine is the fastest and highest quality remote desktop you have ever tried. If I go to View menu (in the Mac OS X menu bar) option Use all displays in. They’re snappy enough, even Google Earth, which has to transfer a plethora of data. Connect to any computer remotely at the speed of light. I have a few Linux apps in a branded zone in Solaris, using them via ssh X forwarding. After logging into the NoMachine workstation (the Mac OS X Login. And whatever you do *don’t* even hint that you might be criticizing the product, even constructively, or accidentally!Īs far as the wire protocol goes, I wouldn’t know. Click the above title to see all FAQs on this topic. Put on your asbestos underwear before asking a question on that list. It’s great on a lan, but horrid over even a high bandwidth WAN connections.įortunately, there is freeNX to handle that case, despite its unnecessarily hostile support community. NoMachine For Mac 5.3.12 NoMachine (Free) User rating Download Technical Title: NoMachine For Mac 5.3. (The worst of this is not inherent in the protocol, but in the implementations, and is being fixed.) Latency kills it. And that is that the over the wire protocol is too chatty and requires way too many round trips. I really only have one complaint about X. Note the total lack of specific criticisms in your own post. In short, in an area where free competition reigns, and despite all the clueless allegations that some like to make against it, no one has been able to beat X. Why, oh why are we still dragging this laggard of an albatross around?īecause no one has been able to come up with anything superior, gain mindshare, gain apps, and successfully supplant X.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |